The Other Stars of the Titanic Tragedy

It seems that this painting by Gordon Johnson is not correct in one respect: the haze on the horizon wasn't there.

My wife and daughter and I visited the Titanic exhibition at the National Geographic Society yesterday, and on the way in we were interviewed by a local CBS radio reporter. I’m afraid we didn’t have that much interesting to say. We weren’t aware of any anniversary (at least, not that it was yesterday in particular) and we weren’t there specifically to see the Titanic exhibition (I was more excited about the Samurai one to tell the truth). But I felt bad about giving such a lackluster interview that I think I’ve been struggling to justify the visit after the fact.

Thanks to The Online Photographer, my favorite photography blog, I found an angle that captured my imagination, and I’ve been thinking about it all day. Yesterday, editor Mike Johnson published a long excerpt from Lawrence Beesley’s 1918 book (now in the public domain), “The Loss of the S.S. (sic) Titanic”. The chapter excerpted is matter-of-factly called “The Sinking of the Titanic, Seen from a Lifeboat.” Beesley was the one doing the seeing.

I’m only going to post a small chunk of the text, rather the way an iceberg presents only a tiny tip of itself out of water. It actually struck me (sorry) for the finely-recorded details of what a spectacular night it was that the ship learned it wasn’t an unterseeboot. Any amateur astronomer on board would have felt supremely lucky to be rewarded with such a starry night, thus making him or her no doubt doubly bitter upon freezing to death in the icy water a few hours later.

Here’s the very fine bit of writing that captures what an exceptionally clear, dark and still night sky served as the backdrop for all that sad drama:

The night was one of the most beautiful I have ever seen: the sky without a single cloud to mar the perfect brilliance of the stars, clustered so thickly together that in places there seemed almost more dazzling points of light set in the black sky than background of sky itself; and each star seemed, in the keen atmosphere, free from any haze, to have increased its brilliance tenfold and to twinkle and glitter with a staccato flash that made the sky seem nothing but a setting made for them in which to display their wonder. They seemed so near, and their light so much more intense than ever before, that fancy suggested they saw this beautiful ship in dire distress below and all their energies had awakened to flash messages across the black dome of the sky to each other; telling and warning of the calamity happening in the world beneath. Later, when the Titanic had gone down and we lay still on the sea waiting for the day to dawn or a ship to come, I remember looking up at the perfect sky and realizing why Shakespeare wrote the beautiful words he puts in the mouth of Lorenzo:—

Jessica, look how the floor of heaven
Is thick inlaid with patines of bright gold.
There’s not the smallest orb which thou behold’st
But in his motion like an angel sings,
Still quiring to the young-eyed cherubims;
Such harmony is in immortal souls;
But whilst this muddy vesture of decay
Doth grossly close it in, we cannot hear it.

[It's sad that most of us don't find that we understand Shakespeare better in the face of tragedy. Those Edwardians had some uncommon depth. Gads, sorry again. -Ed.]

But it seemed almost as if we could—that night: the stars seemed really to be alive and to talk. The complete absence of haze produced a phenomenon I had never seen before: where the sky met the sea the line was as clear and definite as the edge of a knife, so that the water and the air never merged gradually into each other and blended to a softened rounded horizon, but each element was so exclusively separate that where a star came low down in the sky near the clear-cut edge of the waterline, it still lost none of its brilliance. As the earth revolved and the water edge came up and covered partially the star, as it were, it simply cut the star in two, the upper half continuing to sparkle as long as it was not entirely hidden, and throwing a long beam of light along the sea to us.

January’s Second Friday Star Party: If you build it, they will freeze.

Final Report: 8:38pm

So my toes are about defrosted, after ten minutes on the tiles near the wood stove. Our January Second Friday Star Party was a smashing success! Well, 7 people came out, compared to about 120 in November. But know what? They were the 7 most hardy, indefatigable and bravest Genevans out there. Nothing like 12′ fahrenheit to separate the truly curious from those with just a passing notion. I’m kidding–or half kidding. The folks that came out have my admiration. I’m hard core; if it’s clear, I feel like I should be out there, looking up. Standing vigil as the universe holds the candles. These folks stood with me, tonight!

It was a nice time. The group was small enough that I could describe each object to everyone before people started gazing through the telescope, instead of having to repeat certain bits of information over and over. We started with Jupiter and its 4 Galilean moons and prominent cloud band. Then we flipped over to the southeast and scrutinized Orion’s sword, the home of the Great Orion Nebula. Check out Jeremy Perez’s wonderful page of sketches of this nebula. Sketches more realistically show the view through a telescope as opposed to a photograph.

Then we took a quick peak at the Pleiades, which by the way I always have to misspell first and then check it in the automatic dictionary. This cluster of 7 or so naked eye stars reveals itself as a much more populous gathering of sapphires in a telescope, or even a pair of binoculars.

Next stop was the Double Cluster between Cassiopeia (another spell check there), and then finally we took a peak at Polaris, the north star. What’s so special about Polaris? Well, other than the fact that it lies so close to the Earth’s northern rotational axis that it barely appears to move as the earth spins around, it’s also a multiple star system. And a very pretty one. With my 6″ telescope the secondary star is a bit faint, but with the 10″ it’s much brighter and a lovely blue color. Many stars in the universe are multiple stars, as I’ve written about elsewhere on this blog.

Remember that early scene in Star Wars, as Luke is watching multiple suns set over the desert of Tatoine? Well, astronomers weren’t really sure if planets could exist in multiple star systems until just a few days ago, when a team announced they indeed found a planet in a double-star system.

Finally I temporarily blinded everyone by showing them the moon in all its cratered, ridged, mountainous glory. Then my feet started to get cold, and we called it a night.

Thanks again to Sarah Meyer at the Finger Lakes Institute who brought hot cider…it helped!

UPDATE: 6:13pm: Setting up!

I’m heading over to the park now to set up. So if you’re reading this, put on your down parka and pack boots and come on over to Washington Park. Should be decent views of the 1st quarter moon and Jupiter. While it lasts!

UPDATE: 5:52PM: I’m suiting up!

I’m getting on my warm clothes, as of right now there’s seems to be a pretty clear sky. Again, if you can see clear skies at 6:30 in Geneva, then I’ll be there. Of course, it could cloud over in five minutes. I need a sedative!

UPDATE 5:15pm: Still waiting, Still Seeing!

Right now the clouds are gathering. I’m not optimistic. The situation we have right now in the sky presents an opportunity to teach the non-astronomy community a little tidbit of astronomer’s jargon. The word is: Suckerhole. This is a small, fast moving gap in the clouds that “suckers” an astronomer into pointing his telescope at it in the hopes of catching a view of…well, something. That’s the biggest problem with these sirens–it’s very hard to navigate the sky only seeing in a tiny (and moving) portion of it. So an astronomer has to quickly get their bearings, aim their scopes and get it right the first time, and then hurry up and look, focus, look…and well, only a few of us are so skillful. Tonight looks like it might have some suckerholes, at best.

If something radically changes in the next hour and it becomes crystal clear, I’ll still head over with my scope. But if we’ve got more of the same, and you go out and you see suckerholes, well, don’t let them take you.

Original Post:

Weather.gov shows it “mostly cloudy”. The Clear Sky Clock for the historic Smith Observatory shows (as of writing this at 1:35pm) a big dark blue patch in the evening. That means clear. It’s a regular US/Canada hockey match, and today I’m rooting for the Maple Leaves.

I’ll update this throughout the afternoon. As of right now, we’re in “Wait and See” mode. The basic rule remains the same, however: if it’s clear at 6pm, then come on down, we’ve got ourselves a star party. If it’s anything less than totally clear, then check the blog.

Observing in the Cold

This friday is the third Second Friday Star Party of the 2010-2011 season. At this moment, the NOAA forcast is for “mostly cloudy”…but it’s a few days and a few orders of magnitude of reliability away. Though I won’t count my chicks before they hatch, I also won’t throw them out with the bathwater. Tuesday is mixed-metaphor day at Punkastronomy.

By the way, the answer to the question posed in the title of the last post, Monday Night’s Lunar Eclipse: Will We See It? was…no. We were clouded in. I slept on the couch by the woodstove so I wouldn’t wake up the missus, and just before the alarm rang at 3:17am, I got up, looked out the window, saw the red haze of low-lying but complete cloud cover, and went back to sleep. I don’t know anyone in the area who saw it. Them’s the breaks living in the Finger Lakes. Lots of clouds, but we also have a lot of fresh water so when the great water crisis of the next century hits, everyone will have to bow down and worship us, and the people who live around Lake Baikal in Russia. We have wine, they have vodka. So there. Tuesday is free association day at Punkastronomy as well.

The past few months I’ve been moonlighting as an astronomy guide for Hobart and William Smith Colleges’ Astronomy 101 class. I hosted 6 observing nights between September and December. And the one inescapable fact is that our nation’s high schools, prep schools, and indeed even our excellent colleges are failing to teach the next generation: how to dress for cold weather. At first I thought it was just adherence to the orthodox care-free bravura adopted by many university students. But when it was 13 degrees out and a student showed up in docksiders with no socks, then I began to question our civilization’s passionate skirting of Darwinian realities. A little upturned nose at convention–or even common sense–can be a good thing, but this was an existential gaff that really could have cost some blue toes, and given one of the bored ER docs at Geneva General a chance to get out his digit hacksaw.

Amateur astronomers are a die-hard lot. We’re tougher than you think people with more than a passing familiarity with slide-rules and pocket protectors might be. Late nights, sleep deprivation, bitter cold–us amateurs (ORIGIN late 18th cent.: from French, from Italian amatore, from Latin amator ‘lover,’ from amare ‘to love’) are actually pretty hardy folk.

I remember going to the Rochester astronomy club’s observatory one frigid night in February and dressing in the warmest gear I had: Sorel pack boots, a thick pair of woolen paratrooper pants, and a Swedish surplus army coat that at least a dozen sheep sacrificed their hides to produce. I thought I was pretty cool. As I trudged through the snow to the observatory, one of the other club members surprised me by calling out my name. Bill Hugh is one of observing gods of the local astronomy community.

I’ve watched  Bill set up his scope at a star party, swing it to a certain point of the sky with his eyes closed (or looking in the other direction) and he’s zeroed in on an otherwise hard-to-find planetary nebula. That’s a kind of navigational skill I can at this point only aspire to, and be amazed by. Anyway, Bill was wearing these amazing white Army extreme cold weather boots, apparently called “Mickey Mouse” boots by servicepeople and rated to -40′. His tootsies were warm.

But Bill still had socks on! The thing about amatuer astronomy, though I’ve tried to consistently paint it as a brave and nearly glorious light, is that, by and large, it’s a pretty static hobby. It is actually a modified form of loafing, or standing around. Mall rats are actually almost amateur astronomers. They just need a telescope. Don’t tell them and break their illusion of marginalized nonconformity, their indignation will only grow.

And standing around in the cold…well, it makes you cold. You basically have the heat you start off with at the beginning of the evening. You need to keep it in unless you have one of those blast-furnace metabolisms, and really, only the Inuit have those and they still wear multiple animal skins to conserve their body heat.

On a cold winter observing night, even in the Finger Lakes, you really can’t dress too warmly. You’re never likely to overheat, unless the Tripods attacked as you were observing Mars and you were forced to run from cover. Or you had to run inside because you saw a coyote run by and got spooked. One of the two preceding situations actually happened to me, and getting behind closed doors was worth a little sweat.

This is all leading up to my Amateur Astronomer’s Cold Maxim: When it’s August, dress like it’s October. When it’s October, dress like it’s December. When it’s December, dress like it’s Alaska.

So anyway, come out to the Second Friday Star Party this Friday evening. And for heaven’s sakes, dress warm. We’ll have hot cider, but we won’t let you dip your toes into it.

%d bloggers like this: