They Might Be Science: Astronomy Songs (Part II)

Last post, I wrote about how I think the band They Might Be Giants is pretty great. Not only are they the darlings of adult nerds everywhere, they also make kicking kids’ music that doesn’t speak down to the little ones. Their album Here Comes Science is especially awesome, not only because they introduce scientific concepts, but because they actually model the process of scientific inquiry. And, because TMBG knew they were not exactly scientists, they hired a consultant to help them make sure they got it right.

One of the album’s songs, Why Does the Sun Shine?, was originally recorded by Tom Glazer in 1959′s Space Songs. Here is the refrain, taken almost verbatim from the Golden Guide to the Stars, a little book that served as many budding astronomer’s introductory text for decades. I used a version in the late 1980s with my first telescope, a miserable 60mm Edu-Science refractor:

The sun is a mass of incandescent gas
A gigantic nuclear furnace
Where hydrogen is built into helium
At a temperature of millions of degrees

It’s a catchy little ditty, with one problem. It’s wrong. The sun is not made up of incandescent (glowing) gas. The stuff churning around the sun is plasma. Plasma is like a gas (in some ways) but different in others. It’s a fourth state of matter, the oft-ignored sibling of solids, liquids and gases. It’s ionized, which means that the electrons are separated from the nuclei and are free-floating. Plasma conducts electricity, which is also why the sun produces such strong and turbulent magnetic fields, and why solar flares excite the ionosphere of the earth and make aurora. Plasma is the glowy part of a spark, the “stuff” lightning is made up of, the thing that is shining inside a neon sign buzzing incessantly out of your Replicant Hotel window.

But here’s the great part about this story and the thing that makes me love TMBG even more as a scientist than I did way back when as a nerd who was all off course and studying politics; when their album was being fact checked, the out of date info was discovered, and so they wrote a whole new song to correct it. It’s called Why Does the Sun Really Shine? And it is awesome too!

The sun is a miasma
Of incandescent plasma
The sun’s not simply made out of gas
No, no, no
The sun is a quagmire
It’s not made of fire
Forget what you’ve been told in the past(Plasma!) Electrons are free
(Plasma!) A fourth state of matter
Not gas, not liquid, not solid
Ooh!The sun is no red dwarf
I hope it never morphs
Into some supernova’d collapsed orb
Orb, orb, orb
The sun is a miasma
Of incandescent plasma
I forget what I was told by myself
Elf, elf, elf(Plasma!) Electrons are free
(Plasma!) A fourth state of matter
Not gas, not liquid, not solid(Plasma!) Forget that song
(Plasma!) They got it wrong
That thesis has been rendered invalid

Here’s the video:

 

What makes this song so cool is not just that it is a correction, but that it acknowledges the fact and underscores scientific method. The presence of both songs on the album make it a great teaching “object” for young people. The thing about science that sets it apart from most other systems of knowledge devised by humanity is that it changes according to the preponderance of the evidence. It is self-correcting and fact-checking is built in. That is not to say it is perfect. It’s still a flawed human endeavor. But it is remarkably useful. It is perhaps the most powerful problem-solving structure in human history. And now you’ve got two infectious songs to teach to your children that helps communicate the process and power of science.

Interestingly, I’m not sure if the 1959 song (and the Golden Guide which provided the offending passage) got it wrong, or if scientists at the time were mistaken about the nature of the sun. Plasma was discovered in 1879 and got its name in 1928. Should the original authors have known better in 1959?

Three TED Talks for Cloudy Nights

TED is just great. Of course I think that. I’m a nerd. TED is hard-core nerd. So is Prezi, the fluid online presentation platform that many TED speakers use to great effect. TED isn’t perfect. They bungled Nick Hanauer’s talk on how rich people don’t generate jobs, for example. But overall, the internet, and our world, is a little richer because of TED’s work. I’d love to do TEDxGeneva. Anyone want to help?

Anyway, I thought I’d highlight three great TED talks on themes astronomical. All three thought-provoking, and models for what I would uphold as good presentation of science to the public.

First is Jill Tarter’s talk about SETI. This is classic Jill: “We, all of us, are what happens when a primordial mixture of hydrogen and helium evolves for so long that it begins to ask where it came from.” It’s almost Douglas Adams in its wryness, and its insightful power. Her talk is a gold mine of such nuggets. Her talk explains SETI as science. And yes, Tarter was the basis for Carl Sagan’s Ellie Arroway, a heroine after every (atheist) nerd’s heart. Here’s the talk. She’ll even invite you to participate in SETI yourself.

 

Brian Cox is up next. CERN physicist and a popular figure in the UK for making hard science understandable to everyone. Cox once said ”If people don’t have an understanding of what science is and what scientists do, then they can tend to think that global warming, for example, is just a matter of opinion.” Exactly. I should be so pithy. I’m going to clone Brian Cox and put each clone on a bicycle with a portable screen and projector, and set them loose to journey across the highways and byways, explaining to the general public what science is, and why exploration should remain a revered and encouraged part of our culture. Maybe people will be swayed by the accent. And the fact that he’s so pretty.

 

Last up is Brian Greene, a superstring theorist and author of popular science books. Another excellent science communicator, and one with a flare for humanizing his topic that I really admire. I can’t explain string theory to you, because I can’t quite grok it myself, but Brian does a great job of getting us to be in awe of that almost-understanding. And he’s raising his children correctly: “I was holding [my four-year-old daughter] and I said, ‘Sophia, I love you more than anything in the universe.’ And she turned to me and said, ‘Daddy, universe or multiverse?’”

Good question.

 

 

Is there a TED talk on astronomy that you love? Link it in a comment. I haven’t watched them all. I have to cut my toe-nails sometime, after all.

宇宙兄弟: Space Brothers, a review

It must be Made in Japan week here at Bicycle Astronomy. Yesterday I reviewed a cool Japanese bell for your bicycle. Today I’m reviewing a cool Japanese anime (animated series) for all you astronomy and space nerds out there who might relish a pretty realistic story about two brothers who decide to become astronauts.

In the past, I have mused about the (justifiable) costs of space exploration compared to the (unjustifiable) costs of say, plush toys in the (vague) form of animated children’s characters (here), and also why the US’s woeful manned space program doesn’t mean the end of humanity’s journey to the stars (here). Space Brothers comes from the same unabashedly idealistic vision of space as a frontier for human betterment.

Space Brothers, or 宇宙兄弟 (Uchū Kyōdai), was originally a manga (graphic novel) by Chūya Koyama, that was quickly made into an anime and then a live-action film (that I have yet to see). The anime can be screened, with subtitles, on Crunchyroll. Episodes hit that service just days after they show on Japanese TV. So this winter, while my wood stove has warmed my body through the cold months, Space Brothers’s 15 minute episodes have kept me looking up in spite of the clouds.

space brothers

Space Brothers focuses on two brothers who share the dream of going into space. That’s them as children in the inset of the image above, right before they witness a UFO speed off in the direction of the moon. I know, my rational readers are like What? First a space pug and then a UFO? and are wondering if perhaps the Bicycle Astronomer has been ringing that Suzu bell a bit too close to his ears. But the otherworldly is kept at arm’s length in the story, and instead what you get is a pretty realistic, rational, and actually quite fascinating drama about people trying to realize humanity’s ago-old dream to travel to the stars.

(Oh, and there’s a pug in it too, though I have yet to see him in a space suit, except on the promotional materials.)

Hibito, the younger brother (who is blond for some reason) sticks with his determination to become an astronaut and is continuing his training with NASA in Florida, preparing for a lunar mission. Meanwhile, his older brother Mutta (with curly hair, also not exactly a normal thing for the Japanese) has strayed off course and is a car designer. Or at least, he is until he head-butts his boss for a crack against his younger brother, and finds himself out of a job, living at home.

space-bros1

Mutta soon follows in his younger brother’s footsteps, taking multiple exams and facing myriad challenges, interpersonal, personal and formal, on his way to becoming a JAXA (Japan’s space agency) astronaut. The story proceeds slowly. There is no fast montage to get Mutta into a space suit so he fly off to Mars with Hibito only to end up in fierce hand to hand combat with a skinless former astronaut turned demon….thing.

Nope, you get what is called a “slice of life” drama in anime lingo, with characters that are slowly rounded out from cartoonish simplifications into fully-formed and complex people. And the story expands beyond Mutta and Hibito, encompassing a large cast of fleshed-out characters from a wide variety of social backgrounds.

I suspect a lot of details about the JAXA astronaut exams and training exercises are true to life. If you enjoyed The Right Stuff, you will like Space Brothers, though the latter does not share the winky sarcasm of the former.

Give Space Brothers a bunch of episodes before judging it, because it’s a bit slow. The episodes are also very short, and they often spread out a single cliffhanger over several installments (like Mutta and the other candidates waiting for the results of the third and final exam). By that story arc’s denouement, however, I realized that the pace of the show was trying to communicate a fundamental point: it’s the process, all its constituent moments and minute details, and the people involved in that process, that matters. Not the end goal. Not failure or success, nor any one person.

“The people involved in that process” are endearing, and memorable. The traditional salaryman who yearns to do something important even though it means sacrificing a lot of time with his family, the older rocket designer who has already lost his family to his work and now wants to pilot the rockets he has created, the doctor who wants to use her time in space to cure a disease that took her father’s life, the primatologist who struggles with the realization that he actually likes other people…these characters are not one-dimensional, they change, and they surprise you.

We simply don’t make animations like this in the US. Heck, we don’t make live action science fiction with this earnest complexity. If we did, you can bet there would be more support for a manned space program. Instead, our studios and filmmakers spend millions on cool sets and special effects, all to get our heroes to some exotic planet where they get undressed and battle some gooey, tentacled monster with a fire axe. (I’m talking to you, Prometheus!) In Space Brother’s, childhood UFOs aside, it’s all about keeping it real. And refreshingly optimistic.

Go watch now.

Nebulae; A Backyard Cosmography

I didn’t know about Dana Wilde until a few months ago, when I came across a project he started on kickstarter to publish a book called “Nebulae: A Backyard Cosmography”. I’m always on the lookout for good writing about astronomy, so I contacted Dana and asked him for a preview of his book. Dana has been writing a column for the Bangor Daily News called Amateur Naturalist, and a few of the pieces included in the book were first published in that columen. I began to dip into Dana’s writings and really enjoyed it. He has a very clear and yet evocative way with descriptions that I admire, and aspire to.

I’m buying Dana’s book here, and recommend you read the pdf excerpt here. I’ll give it a more thorough review on Punkastronomy soon!

%d bloggers like this: